She's ugly, buck teeth, a face that's a 0 at best, maybe worse, fat, cat lady, total idiot, completely illogical - Looney tune to the max - did I just describe feminists to a T?
MOST - there are a couple which by and large are more logical, but they're the exceptions to the rule and ultimately when it comes to themselves they're just as hypocritical - Candace Owens and Nick Fuentes being a case in particular. No, the latter is not gay, he's just SMART as fuck. Kinda like me... Haha.
Anyway, this is an Indian one "divija Bhasin" or some horrible OF wanna be - its obvious - that wants to be the next Bonnie Blue of India. Truly, gives Thot a new meaning.
I dont blame her, yet she's doing it all wrong. I could outshrink here with a look, and she knows it too.
Sunny Leone, now THAT is the real deal in that regard. I've said it before on www.0excusesfitness.com, if you want, you can resarch why.
Now the latest garbage from her this morning (this is some idiot who like so many others get temp fame on social media, only to fade out in a blaze of nobodydom because all she did was to post provocative pics. Yawn).
Apparently according to her if your father undresses in front of you but not your mother, then it's "indirect misogny schooling".
How dumb can people get? I mean, she wants to get attention, I get it. But you do it the right way, right? Troll RIGHT. And unless she wants to be Duffer of the Millenium, she's doing it wrong.
Like, yes, women undress in front of girls all the time, men in front of boys, locker rooms, all that.
Misandry? Misogny?
It's neither. What it is is NATURAL.
Sexuality is shaped by many things, most of all being MENTAL AS YOU GROW UP - nobody is born gay or straight or whatever, I've explained this before.
This Jillass claims that behavior sexualizes human boobs but not penises.
I mean ... jeez.
She's the most atrocious shrink ever, which explains her current life choices, which is fine, but ...
... look, in ancient India they used to display breasts openly. And they used to, FACT, chop off lower class women's breasts if they dared to cover them, as only nobility could (explains why my mom complains so much about the shirtless Emperor Son she has, and people complain about my skivvies, how dare Emperor sit in those instead of fine robes).
Cos I don't give 2 shits.
There was also a breast tax.
Its simple.
You outlaw something, cover it up, there is natural fascination for it. Moonshine fduring the Prohibition, what not. The fact I have to explain these basics is beyond even my immense intellect, better than all else ...
And as far as misogny, misandry, sexualizing certain things, it is all mental. Feet aren't covered, just look at Ben Gay and hordes of so called straight men "straight as an arrow" into feet and cock and I make money off 'em ...
Its simple, different genders.
And there are only 2..
These are the same wackos that advocate men in women's bathrooms and other garbage.
But of course they'll never say its misandry and sexualization if adult women undress in front of their kids which women are far more comfortable with that stuff anyway.
So ... GAY and hypocritical. Eh?
At least leave kids out of it. Dad undressing or whatever doesn't mean anything other than you get to see what a dick looks like as an adult, its that simple. Men walk around with shirts off, its equally sexualized by women - just take a look at me for instance.
The lunacy is amazing!
Later.
Dr Rahul Mookerjee, M.D.
